BIOSCIENCE 包括关于研究成果和技术的文章、生物学教育的进步、关于生物学最新前沿的专业撰写的专题文章、专业问题的讨论、书评、关于 AIBS 的新闻、政策专栏（华盛顿观察）和教育专栏（关注教育）。圆桌会议、论坛和观点文章提供意见领袖的观点并邀请进一步评论。

The journal BioScience includes articles on research findings and technologies, advancements in biology education, specialized articles on the latest frontiers in biology, discussions on professional issues, book reviews, news about AIBS, a policy column (Washington Observations), and an education column (Focus on Education). Roundtable discussions, forums, and opinion pieces provide insights from thought leaders and invite further commentary.

《BioScience》期刊涵盖了研究成果和技术的文章、生物学教育的进展、关于生物学前沿的专题文章、专业问题的讨论、书评、AIBS的新闻、政策专栏（华盛顿观察）和教育专栏（关注教育）。此外，期刊还包括圆桌会议、论坛和观点文章，提供意见领袖的见解，并邀请进一步的评论。

BioScience

The selection of breeding habitat has broadscale implications for species distributions and community structure and smaller-scale ramifications for offspring survival and parental fitness. In anurans, offspring deposition is a decisionmaking process that involves the assessment of multiple factors at a breeding site, including the presence of predators and competitors. Evolutionary theory predicts that adult anurans should seek to minimize the risk of predation to offspring, reduce the pressure of competition, and maximize offspring survival. Many experimental studies have demonstrated the ability of anurans to assess deposition sites for predation and competition and to choose accordingly, but our understanding of the various ecological factors involved in site choice and the broader consequences of choice is still limited. Here, we review and synthesize the literature on the influence of predators and competitors on anuran deposition behavior. We highlight current gaps in our understanding of this topic and outline future avenues of research.

Valerie L. Buxton

Jinelle H. Sperry

Reproductive Decisions in Anurans: A Review of How Predation and Competition Affects the Deposition of Eggs And Tadpoles

Global biodiversity and ecosystem service models typically operate independently. Ecosystem service projections may therefore be overly optimistic because they do not always account for the role of biodiversity in maintaining ecological functions. We review models used in recent global model intercomparison projects and develop a novel model integration framework to more fully account for the role of biodiversity in ecosystem function, a key gap for linking biodiversity changes to ecosystem services. We propose two integration pathways. The first uses empirical data on biodiversity-ecosystem function relationships to bridge biodiversity and ecosystem function models and could currently be implemented globally for systems and taxa with sufficient data. We also propose a trait-based approach involving greater incorporation of biodiversity into ecosystem function models. Pursuing both approaches will provide greater insight into biodiversity and ecosystem services projections. Integrating biodiversity, ecosystem function, and ecosystem service modeling will enhance policy development to meet global sustainability goals.

Sarah R Weiskopf

Bonnie J E Myers

Maria Isabel Arce-Plata

Julia L Blanchard

Simon Ferrier

Elizabeth A Fulton

Mike Harfoot

Forest Isbell

Justin A Johnson

Akira S Mori

Ensheng Weng

Zuzana V HarmáCˇková

María Cecilia Londoño-Murcia

Brian W Miller

Laura M Pereira

Isabel M D Rosa

A Conceptual Framework to Integrate Biodiversity, Ecosystem Function, and Ecosystem Service Models

enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research.

Marianne V. Moore

Stephanie E. Hampton

Lyubov R. Izmest'eva

Eugene A. Silow

Ekaterina V. Peshkova

Boris K. Pavlov

Climate Change and the World's “Sacred Sea”—Lake Baikal, Siberia

气候变化与世界“圣海”——西伯利亚的贝加尔湖

We assess progress toward the protection of 50% of the terrestrial biosphere to address the species-extinction crisis and conserve a global ecological heritage for future generations. Using a map of Earth's 846 terrestrial ecoregions, we show that 98 ecoregions (12%) exceed Half Protected; 313 ecoregions (37%) fall short of Half Protected but have sufficient unaltered habitat remaining to reach the target; and 207 ecoregions (24%) are in peril, where an average of only 4% of natural habitat remains. We propose a Global Deal for Nature—a companion to the Paris Climate Deal—to promote increased habitat protection and restoration, national- and ecoregion-scale conservation strategies, and the empowerment of indigenous peoples to protect their sovereign lands. The goal of such an accord would be to protect half the terrestrial realm by 2050 to halt the extinction crisis while sustaining human livelihoods.

Eric Dinerstein

David Olson

Anup Joshi

Carly Vynne

Neil D Burgess

Eric Wikramanayake

Nathan Hahn

Suzanne Palminteri

Prashant Hedao

Reed Noss

Matt Hansen

Harvey Locke

Erle C Ellis

Benjamin Jones

Charles Victor Barber

Randy Hayes

Cyril Kormos

Vance Martin

Eileen Crist

Wes Sechrest

Lori Price

Jonathan E M Baillie

Don Weeden

Kierán Suckling

Crystal Davis

Nigel Sizer

Rebecca Moore

David Thau

Tanya Birch

Peter Potapov

Svetlana Turubanova

Alexandra Tyukavina

Nadia de Souza

Lilian Pintea

José C Brito

Othman A Llewellyn

Anthony G Miller

Annette Patzelt

Shahina A Ghazanfar

Jonathan Timberlake

Heinz Klöser

Yara Shennan-Farpón

Roeland Kindt

Jens-Peter Barnekow Lillesø

Paulo van Breugel

Lars Graudal

Maianna Voge

Khalaf F Al-Shammari

Muhammad Saleem

An Ecoregion-Based Approach to Protecting Half the Terrestrial Realm

基于生态区域的保护陆地领域一半面积的方法

Ecology has joined a world of big data. Two complementary frameworks define big data: data that exceed the analytical capacities of individuals or disciplines or the “Four Vs” axes of volume, variety, veracity, and velocity. Variety predominates in ecoinformatics and limits the scalability of ecological science. Volume varies widely. Ecological velocity is low but growing as data throughput and societal needs increase. Ecological big-data systems include in situ and remote sensors, community data resources, biodiversity databases, citizen science, and permanent stations. Technological solutions include the development of open code- and data-sharing platforms, flexible statistical models that can handle heterogeneous data and sources of uncertainty, and cloud-computing delivery of high-velocity computing to large-volume analytics. Cultural solutions include training targeted to early and current scientific workforce and strengthening collaborations among ecologists and data scientists. The broader goal is to maximize the power, scalability, and timeliness of ecological insights and forecasting.

Scott S Farley

Andria Dawson

Simon J Goring

John W Williams

Situating Ecology as a Big-Data Science: Current Advances, Challenges, and Solutions

将生态学定位为大数据科学：当前进展、挑战与解决方案

David S Mason

Mark E Bell

Kenneth F Kellner

Abigail Bennett

Tom Weston

Joseph Presgrove

Jerrold L Belant

Wild harvests could aid food insecurity and reduce wildlife hyperabundance

野生采集可缓解粮食不安全并减少野生动物过度繁殖

Niki Frantzeskaki

Simos Malamis

The missing piece in restoring Europe's ecosystems: Urban riverscapes

欧洲生态系统恢复中缺失的一环：城市河流景观

Abstract National, subnational, and supranational entities are creating biodiversity strategy and action plans (BSAPs) to develop concrete commitments and actions to curb biodiversity loss, meet international obligations, and achieve a society in harmony with nature. In light of policymakers’ increasing recognition of genetic diversity in species and ecosystem adaptation and resilience, this article provides an overview of how BSAPs can incorporate species’ genetic diversity. We focus on three areas: setting targets; committing to actions, policies, and programs; and monitoring and reporting. Drawing from 21 recent BSAPs, we provide examples of policies, knowledge, projects, capacity building, and more. We aim to enable and inspire specific and ambitious BSAPs and have put forward 10 key suggestions mapped to the policy cycle. Together, scientists and policymakers can translate high level commitments, such as the Convention on Biological Diversity’s Kunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, into concrete nationally relevant targets, actions and policies, and monitoring and reporting mechanisms.

Sean Hoban

Christina Hvilsom

Abdeldjalil Aissi

Alexandre Aleixo

Julie Bélanger

Katarzyna Biala

Robert Ekblom

Ancuta Fedorca

W Chris Funk

Alejandra Lorena Goncalves

Andrew Gonzalez

Myriam Heuertz

Alice Hughes

Fumiko Ishihama

Belma Kalamujic Stroil

Linda Laikre

Philip J K McGowan

Katie L Millette

David O'Brien

Ivan Paz-Vinas

Victor Julio Rincón-Parra

Marine Robuchon

Jon Paul Rodríguez

María Alejandra Rodríguez-Morales

Gernot Segelbacher

Tiffany R A Straza

Ruliyana Susanti

Ntakadzeni Tshidada

Sibelle Torres Vilaça

Jessica M da Silva

How can biodiversity strategy and action plans incorporate genetic diversity and align with global commitments?

如何将遗传多样性纳入生物多样性战略和行动计划，并与全球承诺保持一致？

Abstract Ecology spans spatial and temporal scales and is inclusive of the history of life on Earth. However, research that occurs at millennial timescales or longer has historically been defined as paleoecology and has not always been well integrated with modern (neo-) ecology. This bifurcation has been previously highlighted, with calls for improved engagement among the subdisciplines, but their priority research areas have not been directly compared. To characterize the research agendas for terrestrial ecological research across different temporal scales, we compared two previous studies, Sutherland and colleagues (2013; neoecology) and Seddon and colleagues (2014; paleoecology), that outlined priority research questions. We identified several themes with potential for temporal integration and explored case studies that highlight cross-temporal collaboration. Finally, a path forward is outlined, focusing on education and training, research infrastructure, and collaboration. Our aim is to improve our understanding of biodiversity patterns and processes by promoting an inclusive and integrative approach that treats time as a foundational concept in ecology.

Lauren Azevedo-Schmidt

Madeleine Landrum

Meghan M Spoth

Nikhil R Brocchini

Kit M Hamley

Alessandro Mereghetti

Andrea J Tirrell

Jacquelyn L Gill

Advancing terrestrial ecology by improving cross-temporal research and collaboration

通过加强跨时间研究与合作推进陆地生态学

Journal Article Is our climate fight killing the environment? A case for smart from the start planning Get access Michael J Clifford, Michael J Clifford The Nature Conservancy, Las Vegas, Nevada, United States Corresponding author. E-mail: michael.clifford@tnc.org https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1509-9280 Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Peter Gower, Peter Gower Western US and Canada Division of The Nature Conservancy, Reno, Nevada, United States Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Tanya Anderson, Tanya Anderson The Nature Conservancy, Las Vegas, Nevada, United States Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Jaina Moan, Jaina Moan The Nature Conservancy, Reno, Nevada, United States Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Mickey Hazelwood, Mickey Hazelwood The Nature Conservancy, Reno, Nevada, United States Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Sophie S Parker, Sophie S Parker The Nature Conservancy, Los Angeles, California, United States https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9134-0742 Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Laurel Saito Laurel Saito The Nature Conservancy, Reno, Nevada, United States https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3617-3133 Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar BioScience, biae122, https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biae122 Published: 23 November 2024 Article history Received: 20 September 2024 Revision received: 31 October 2024 Accepted: 06 November 2024 Published: 23 November 2024

Michael J Clifford

Peter Gower

Tanya Anderson

Jaina Moan

Mickey Hazelwood

Sophie S Parker

Laurel Saito

Is our climate fight killing the environment? A case for smart from the start planning

我们的气候斗争是否正在破坏环境？从一开始就进行智能规划的案例

Abbreviation	Bioscience
Journal Impact	7.46
Quartiles(Global)	BIOLOGY(Q1)

ISSN	0006-3568, 1525-3244
h-index	242
Top Journals	Yes

Publication Information	Publisher: Oxford University Press，Publishing cycle: Monthly，Journal Type: journal，Open Access Journals: No
Basic data	Year of publication: 1988，Proportion of original research papers: 94.37%，Self Citation Rate:2.60%， Gold OA Rate: 43.04%
Average review cycle	网友分享经验：平均3.0个月
Average recruitment ratio	网友分享经验：一般

BioScience

Journal Citation Format

A journal article with 1 author

A journal article with 2 authors

A journal article with 3 authors

A journal article with 5 or more authors

Books Citation Format

Thesis Citation Format

Web sites Citation Format

Patent Citation Format

Staying up late manually editing references? ivySCI automatically matches journals and helps you generate references with a single click.

Share Submission Experience